Transaction Safety
Every write runs inside a database transaction, rules included, so a failed step rolls the whole thing back instead of leaving half a record behind for someone to find later.
Illustrative UI only. Data and individuals shown are fictitious; any resemblance to real persons or data is coincidental.
All or nothing, always
Transactions aren't something a developer remembers to add. Every write gets one automatically. If any step fails, everything rolls back and the record is exactly as it was.
The rules run inside it
The automation that responds to a write runs inside the same transaction as the write. A rule that fails takes the write down with it, so a half-created record is structurally impossible.
Locking where money moves
Rows are locked before contested changes. A payment status can't be flipped by two people at once, because the second one waits for the first to finish.
Side effects wait for the commit
Emails, notifications and queued work fire only after the write is safely committed. A transaction that rolls back can't leave a ghost email announcing something that never happened.
Why we like this one
This is the feature you only notice when it's missing: the claim with a payment but no payee, the policy that exists in one screen and not another, the total that doesn't match its parts. Insurance data is exactly the kind of data where "mostly consistent" isn't consistent at all, and the honest way to guarantee it is at the database, on every write, without asking anyone to remember.
Book a demo ➝