Event Subscriptions
One change fans out to everything watching it. Parent totals recompute, automations fire, dependent records follow, all with the guardrails that stop a fan-out from becoming a spiral.
Illustrative UI only. Data and individuals shown are fictitious; any resemblance to real persons or data is coincidental.
Rollups without report jobs
A parent's sum, count, average or latest-value recomputes when a child changes. It's declared as configuration, not maintained as an overnight batch that's wrong all afternoon.
Fan-out waits for the commit
Nothing downstream reacts until the change that caused it is safely committed. A write that rolls back fans out to precisely nobody.
Subscribe with conditions
An automation can watch "opportunity updated where the stage moved to Closed Won". The condition is part of the subscription, so it fires on the change that matters, not every save.
Loop-proof by design
Depth limits and cycle detection stop a change that triggers a change from chasing its own tail, and duplicate deliveries of the same event are recognised and dropped.
Why we like this one
Keeping related records in step is where systems quietly rot: the total maintained by a nightly job, the status somebody was supposed to update by hand. Subscriptions invert that: the change itself announces what happened, and everything that cares reacts once, in order, after the data is real. The guardrails are the grown-up part. Dedupe, depth limits and cycle detection mean the fan-out is something you can trust, not something you monitor.
Book a demo ➝